Beware: Potential employers see the dumb things you do online

Leslie Kwoh | Wall Street Journal

Drunken party photos. Insensitive jokes. Foul language. Any employer who uses social media to research job candidates is probably used to stumbling upon such indiscretions by now.

The Internet offers companies a gold mine of information about potential hires—and much of it doesn’t make for a good first impression. As social media continues to grow in popularity, however, the challenge for employers is deciding which gaffes are acceptable—and which are deal breakers.

While companies have been cautious about turning to the Internet as a research tool, a recent CareerBuilder study found that two in five companies now use social-networking sites like LinkedIn, Facebook, FB -2.74% MySpace and Twitter to screen potential candidates. Most are looking to see that a candidate appears professional and will fit in with company culture, according to the survey, which polled 2,000 hiring managers and human-resources professionals.

These social-media background checks have given rise to a whole new host of deal breakers, career experts say. At one time, spelling and grammar mistakes on a résumé might have taken a candidate out of the running; now, recruiters are much more likely to forgive a typo than, say, trashing an employer on Facebook, says Donna Weiss, a managing director at Corporate Executive Board, a research and advisory firm.

online infograph

Indeed, 44% of recruiters said that trashing an employer on social media is enough to land an applicant in the reject pile, according to a Corporate Executive Board study of 215 recruiters earlier this year. Just 26% said they view a résumé typo the same way. Inappropriate language was considered unforgivable by 30% of those surveyed; 17% looked at excessive personal information that way.

Subtle Clues

Companies also are using social media to pick up on more subtle clues about job applicants’ work styles. Pete Maulik, chief strategy officer at Fahrenheit 212, a New York-based innovation consulting firm, says he was close to hiring an “excellent” candidate last year when he decided to check the man’s LinkedIn profile as a final precaution. That’s when he realized the candidate probably wasn’t a team player, he says.

“He took credit for everything short of splitting the atom,” Mr. Maulik says. “Everything was, ‘I did this.’ He seemed like a lone wolf. He did everything himself.”

Another promising job applicant used his Twitter account to disparage just about every new innovation in the marketplace, he recalls. “It became clear he was much more comfortable as the critic than the collaborative creator,” Mr. Maulik says.

The company didn’t hire either candidate, he says.

Likewise, ProProfs, a California firm that specializes in online testing tools, was close to signing on a freelance writer when a LinkedIn check showed the candidate was freelancing for another company, says CEO Sameer Bhatia. The candidate confessed to omitting that detail, saying the existing employer had demanded exclusivity.

“We saw this as a sign of dishonesty and lack of loyalty,” Mr. Bhatia says, adding that the company didn’t hire the writer.

While some employers may be willing to overlook the occasional rowdy photo or off-color tweet, it goes without saying that any post linking a job candidate to illicit activity such as drinking and driving or illegal drugs, or to racist or sexist behavior, won’t go over well.

Surprisingly, some job seekers have yet to absorb that message, recruiters say.

Max Drucker, CEO of Social Intelligence Corp., which screens job applicants on behalf of companies, estimates that 5% to 10% of Internet background checks for clients turn up red flags, even though each job candidate must give consent in order to be screened. “You cannot believe the stuff we see,” he says. “You’d be surprised how many people still keep their Facebook profiles public.”

Life as an Open Book

Millennials, in particular, are vulnerable to these mistakes because they have a greater presence on social media and have grown up sharing their thoughts and feelings online. Many of them are open to adding superiors and colleagues as Facebook friends but don’t have enough work experience to understand that certain behavior might be inappropriate for a professional audience, says Brendan Wallace, CEO of Identified, a networking site for young workers.

“The social-media identity they carved out was never created with the end goal of a job in mind,” Mr. Wallace says.

To be sure, some companies are reluctant to add social-media checks to their hiring process, saying they believe the negatives outweigh the positives. “It’s very difficult to defend yourself when you reject a candidate,” says Neil Sims, a managing director at executive search firm Boyden.

By going online, employers expose themselves to all kinds of information that cannot be legally considered in the hiring process, such as religion, race, gender and health status, says Social Intelligence’s Mr. Drucker. Some factors could sway the employer, even if only subconsciously. It might be difficult for an employer to hire a pregnant woman, for example, knowing that she might soon take maternity leave, he says.

Still, with so much information available online these days, when it comes to social media screening, “employers are damned if they do, damned if they don’t,” Mr. Drucker says.

Ms. Kwoh is a staff reporter for The Wall Street Journal in New York. She can be reached at leslie.kwoh@wsj.com

A version of this article appeared October 29, 2012, on page B8 in the U.S. edition of The Wall Street Journal, with the headline: Beware: Potential Employers See The Dumb Things You Do Online.

Now Is Not The Time To Accept A Counter Offer

Robin Judson |

Jack G. complained constantly that his fund did not pay him anywhere close to the value he produced. In his role as a Principal in XYZ Private Equity Fund, he had significant P&L attached to the portfolio companies he worked with, sat on two boards and a deal he originated was about to close. Two

... Read Article


Some Wall Street dealmakers are choosing WFH over big paydays, as return-to-office plans become key to recruiting

Samantha Stokes | Insider

Recruiters told Insider that some senior bankers at the managing-director level and above are saying they won’t consider new roles that are based in the office full-time. Samantha Lee/Business Insider Flexible-work policies are top of mind for many senior bankers, recruiters say. Candidates are turning down roles that don’t allow remote work at least sometimes. Some

... Read Article


Wall Street’s Hottest Commodity: College Grads With Excel Skills

Mary Biekert | Wall Street Journal

All across Wall Street, one price keeps going up: the one for young talent. Big banks can’t hire junior staff fast enough — not even at the new going rate of $100,000 a year. Chalk it up to the pandemic. Or the notoriously long hours. Or youthful realizations that maybe banking isn’t all it’s cracked

... Read Article


How To Handle Job Offers In The Post-Lockdown Economy

Robin Judson |

Many job searches during this post-lockdown period result in candidates receiving multiple offers. How to best handle the scenario.

... Read Article


A Guide To Interviewing From A Career Recruiter

Robin Judson | Robin Judson Partners

We believe we know interviewing because we have been in the financial recruiting business for over 25 years. This is our guide.

... Read Article


How To Nail A Video Interview

Robin Judson |

With the on-going pandemic, we see many of our clients conducting their interviews on Zoom, Skype and other services.    The video interview offers the best and worst combination of telephone and personal interviews.   We suspect that even after the end of the pandemic,  the video interview is here to stay, for at least a couple

... Read Article


A Simple Approach to Successful Interviewing

Robin Judson |

Those of you who have worked with us know that we always emphasize one key approach to interviews. We always say, be yourself.  Be your best self but be yourself. Don’t try to be what you think the interviewer wants.  You don’t really know what they want.  You could lose the opportunity because they perceive

... Read Article